Competitor profile

MS Masood Ahmed

They win 30% of what they bid, and 23% of the value they chase.

51tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
21 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
43
51 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
13
19 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹99.5 Cr
of ₹435.8 Cr bid — 22.8% conversion
Win rate
30.2%
of 43 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count43 bids
30.2%
25.6%
44.2%
Awarded1330.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1125.6%
Lost1944.2%
By value₹435.8 Cr
22.8%
46.0%
31.2%
Awarded₹99.5 Cr22.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹200.3 Cr46.0%
Lost₹136.0 Cr31.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

13 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
GHAI STONE CRUSHER1 win · 12 shared tenders
₹2.4 Cr
won head-to-head
02
GHULAM NABI MIR0 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
RATTAN CHAND AND SONS1 win · 10 shared tenders
₹8.4 Cr
won head-to-head
04
M/S NEEL CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPERS2 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹27.1 Cr
won head-to-head
05
M/S FAZAL REHMAN DAR1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹11.2 Cr
won head-to-head
06
M/S TBA INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.3 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹14.6 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMS Masood Ahmed awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MS Masood Ahmed

About MS Masood Ahmed

MS Masood Ahmed appears as a bidder on 51 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 43 decided bids, it was awarded 13 — a 30.2% win rate — worth ₹99.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PMGSY Jammu and CE PW (R and B) Jammu, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against GHAI STONE CRUSHER, GHULAM NABI MIR and RATTAN CHAND AND SONS. GHAI STONE CRUSHER bid on 12 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; MS Masood Ahmed won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.