Competitor profile

ZOHEB KILLEDAR

They win 64% of what they bid, and 67% of the value they chase.

39tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
4 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
39
39 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
25
11 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.1 Cr
of ₹3.1 Cr bid — 67.3% conversion
Win rate
64.1%
of 39 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count39 bids
64.1%
28.2%
Awarded2564.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected37.7%
Lost1128.2%
By value₹3.1 Cr
67.3%
25.6%
Awarded₹2.1 Cr67.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹22.4 L7.1%
Lost₹80.6 L25.6%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

VILLAGE PANCHAYATS₹15.2 L7.2%

Operating states

LowHigh
Goa₹2.1 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Shinto John1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹9.6 L
won head-to-head
02
Nilesh Nagvenkar1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹9.0 L
won head-to-head
03
C. G. Kannur1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹4.3 L
won head-to-head
04
RENUKA CONSTRUCTIONS1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹8.9 L
won head-to-head
05
Mereena Builders0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Pavan Engineering Corporation0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedZOHEB KILLEDAR awardedOthers

About ZOHEB KILLEDAR

ZOHEB KILLEDAR appears as a bidder on 39 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 39 decided bids, it was awarded 25 — a 64.1% win rate — worth ₹2.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 4 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, at 57.8% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Goa. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Shinto John, Nilesh Nagvenkar and C. G. Kannur. Shinto John bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; ZOHEB KILLEDAR won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.