Competitor profile

YOGESH NARSING WABLE

They win 22% of what they bid, and 30% of the value they chase.

10tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
16 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
9
10 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.7 Cr
of ₹5.6 Cr bid — 29.5% conversion
Win rate
22.2%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count9 bids
22.2%
33.3%
44.4%
Awarded222.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected333.3%
Lost444.4%
By value₹5.6 Cr
29.5%
35.8%
34.7%
Awarded₹1.7 Cr29.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.0 Cr35.8%
Lost₹2.0 Cr34.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹1.7 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ASHISH HANUMANT NIGADE0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
PREETI YOGESH WABLE2 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹1.0 Cr
won head-to-head
03
GAURAV APPASAHEB KUL0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Aryan Construction0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
S K ASSOCIATES0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
J K JAGTAP AND CO0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedYOGESH NARSING awardedOthers

About YOGESH NARSING WABLE

YOGESH NARSING WABLE appears as a bidder on 10 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 22.2% win rate — worth ₹1.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 16 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Region-Pune, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ASHISH HANUMANT NIGADE, PREETI YOGESH WABLE and GAURAV APPASAHEB KUL. ASHISH HANUMANT NIGADE bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; YOGESH NARSING WABLE won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.