Competitor profile

WORKERS MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE CHABHAL

They win 50% of what they bid — and 100% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

4tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
4 Dec 2024last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3
of ₹3 bid — 100.0% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded250.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected250.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹3
100.0%
Awarded₹3100.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Punjab₹3

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
DEEPAK CHOPRA1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹25
won head-to-head
02
YAQUB MASIH CONTRACTOR1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹37
won head-to-head
03
Satinderpal Singh0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SUKHWINDER SINGH0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
DANIAL MASIH0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
₹1
won head-to-head
Rival awardedWORKERS MANAGEMENT awardedOthers

About WORKERS MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE CHABHAL

WORKERS MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE CHABHAL appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹3 in total. Its most recent award on record is from 4 Dec 2024.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Department of Food Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Punjab. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against DEEPAK CHOPRA, YAQUB MASIH CONTRACTOR and Satinderpal Singh. DEEPAK CHOPRA bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; WORKERS MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE CHABHAL won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.