Competitor profile

M/S. Vyas Vatika Constructions co.

They win 43% of what they bid, and 52% of the value they chase.

23tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
2 Feb 2026last award
Total bids
21
23 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
9
12 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.2 Cr
of ₹2.2 Cr bid — 51.8% conversion
Win rate
42.9%
of 21 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count21 bids
42.9%
57.1%
Awarded942.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1257.1%
By value₹2.2 Cr
51.8%
48.2%
Awarded₹1.2 Cr51.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.1 Cr48.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

9 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S PARMOD KUMAR1 win · 13 shared tenders
₹4.5 L
won head-to-head
02
SP Builders3 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹40.8 L
won head-to-head
03
NATHU RAM AND SONS1 win · 10 shared tenders
₹8.0 L
won head-to-head
04
M/S VIJAY TRADERS0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
R. P. Suppliers and Construction Co.2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹16.6 L
won head-to-head
06
m/s Sohan singh barwal and Brothers1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹7.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedVyas Vatika awardedOthers

About M/S. Vyas Vatika Constructions co.

M/S. Vyas Vatika Constructions co. appears as a bidder on 23 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 21 decided bids, it was awarded 9 — a 42.9% win rate — worth ₹1.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 2 Feb 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S PARMOD KUMAR, SP Builders and NATHU RAM AND SONS. M/S PARMOD KUMAR bid on 13 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/S. Vyas Vatika Constructions co. won 6.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.