Competitor profile

M/S Vipranshu Enterprises

They win 33% of what they bid, but only 22% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

70tenders on record
6buyer authorities
1state
20 Aug 2025last award
Total bids
70
70 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
23
40 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.4 Cr
of ₹10.9 Cr bid — 21.7% conversion
Win rate
32.9%
of 70 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count70 bids
32.9%
10.0%
57.1%
Awarded2332.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected710.0%
Lost4057.1%
By value₹10.9 Cr
21.7%
16.7%
61.6%
Awarded₹2.4 Cr21.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.8 Cr16.7%
Lost₹6.7 Cr61.6%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹2.4 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
NAAVI ENTERPRISES2 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹13.4 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S VAISHALI ENTERPRISES7 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M/S TECHNOID SYSTEMS SOLUTION3 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹21.3 L
won head-to-head
04
Yogesh Associates1 win · 9 shared tenders
₹5.5 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S ARVIND ELECTRICALS2 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹56.9 L
won head-to-head
06
Bhavya Enterprises1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹8.4 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedVipranshu Enterprises awardedOthers

About M/S Vipranshu Enterprises

M/S Vipranshu Enterprises appears as a bidder on 70 government tenders on record, from 6 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 70 decided bids, it was awarded 23 — a 32.9% win rate — worth ₹2.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 20 Aug 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Amber Development Authority, at 95.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against NAAVI ENTERPRISES, M/S VAISHALI ENTERPRISES and M/S TECHNOID SYSTEMS SOLUTION. NAAVI ENTERPRISES bid on 13 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; M/S Vipranshu Enterprises won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.