Competitor profile

NAAVI ENTERPRISES

They win 37% of what they bid, and 34% of the value they chase.

27tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
26 Nov 2024last award
Total bids
27
27 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
10
15 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹61.4 L
of ₹1.8 Cr bid — 34.4% conversion
Win rate
37.0%
of 27 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count27 bids
37.0%
55.6%
Awarded1037.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected27.4%
Lost1555.6%
By value₹1.8 Cr
34.4%
57.2%
Awarded₹61.4 L34.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹15.0 L8.4%
Lost₹1.0 Cr57.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹61.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S Vipranshu Enterprises4 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹18.4 L
won head-to-head
02
Ms SINGADIA ENTERPRISES4 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹20.0 L
won head-to-head
03
S.K.ELECTRIC COMPANY1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹7.8 L
won head-to-head
04
PUNIT ENTERPRISES2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹13.9 L
won head-to-head
05
VISHAL ENGINEERING COMPANY1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹7.3 L
won head-to-head
06
Yogesh Associates0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNAAVI ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About NAAVI ENTERPRISES

NAAVI ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 27 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 27 decided bids, it was awarded 10 — a 37.0% win rate — worth ₹61.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 26 Nov 2024.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Amber Development Authority, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S Vipranshu Enterprises, Ms SINGADIA ENTERPRISES and S.K.ELECTRIC COMPANY. M/S Vipranshu Enterprises bid on 13 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; NAAVI ENTERPRISES won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.