Competitor profile

viploveraj singhvi

They win 26% of what they bid, and 31% of the value they chase.

19tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
5 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
19
19 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹10.5 Cr
of ₹33.6 Cr bid — 31.2% conversion
Win rate
26.3%
of 19 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count19 bids
26.3%
42.1%
31.6%
Awarded526.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected842.1%
Lost631.6%
By value₹33.6 Cr
31.2%
41.7%
27.1%
Awarded₹10.5 Cr31.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹14.0 Cr41.7%
Lost₹9.1 Cr27.1%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Public Works Region₹6.4 Cr61.5%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹10.5 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
G M Chandankhede1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹80.4 L
won head-to-head
02
RRPG INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
NITIN SUDHAKARRAO MULKALWAR0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
t h nakade0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
C. S. Dharpure1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹47.7 L
won head-to-head
06
m/srrconstruction0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedviploveraj awardedOthers

About viploveraj singhvi

viploveraj singhvi appears as a bidder on 19 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 19 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 26.3% win rate — worth ₹10.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Region, at 61.5% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against G M Chandankhede, RRPG INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED and NITIN SUDHAKARRAO MULKALWAR. G M Chandankhede bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; viploveraj singhvi won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.