Competitor profile

VIPAN KUMAR CONTRACTOR

They win 26% of what they bid, and 18% of the value they chase.

43tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
30 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
39
43 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
10
22 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹57.8 Cr
of ₹330.2 Cr bid — 17.5% conversion
Win rate
25.6%
of 39 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count39 bids
25.6%
17.9%
56.4%
Awarded1025.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected717.9%
Lost2256.4%
By value₹330.2 Cr
17.5%
20.2%
62.3%
Awarded₹57.8 Cr17.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹66.7 Cr20.2%
Lost₹205.8 Cr62.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

10 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RATTAN CHAND AND SONS1 win · 13 shared tenders
₹7.9 Cr
won head-to-head
02
MS SHAM ARMY STORE3 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹21.7 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M/S R K Gupta and Co0 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Tarmac Road and Roof Builders0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Pardeep Loria4 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹40.7 Cr
won head-to-head
06
M/S FAZAL REHMAN DAR1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹6.2 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedVIPAN KUMAR awardedOthers

About VIPAN KUMAR CONTRACTOR

VIPAN KUMAR CONTRACTOR appears as a bidder on 43 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 39 decided bids, it was awarded 10 — a 25.6% win rate — worth ₹57.8 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PMGSY Jammu and CE PW (R and B) Jammu, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against RATTAN CHAND AND SONS, MS SHAM ARMY STORE and M/S R K Gupta and Co. RATTAN CHAND AND SONS bid on 13 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; VIPAN KUMAR CONTRACTOR won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.