Competitor profile

MS SHAM ARMY STORE

They win 25% of what they bid, and 26% of the value they chase.

43tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
14 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
40
43 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
10
19 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹91.9 Cr
of ₹357.7 Cr bid — 25.7% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 40 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count40 bids
25.0%
27.5%
47.5%
Awarded1025.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1127.5%
Lost1947.5%
By value₹357.7 Cr
25.7%
16.1%
58.2%
Awarded₹91.9 Cr25.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹57.6 Cr16.1%
Lost₹208.2 Cr58.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

10 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RATTAN CHAND AND SONS0 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
VIPAN KUMAR CONTRACTOR4 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹18.4 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M/S R K Gupta and Co0 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
MS Ghulam Qadir Sheikh & Sons0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
MR QAZI MOHD ARIF0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S TBA INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMS SHAM ARMY awardedOthers

About MS SHAM ARMY STORE

MS SHAM ARMY STORE appears as a bidder on 43 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 40 decided bids, it was awarded 10 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹91.9 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 14 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PMGSY Jammu and CE PW (R and B) Jammu, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against RATTAN CHAND AND SONS, VIPAN KUMAR CONTRACTOR and M/S R K Gupta and Co. RATTAN CHAND AND SONS bid on 13 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; MS SHAM ARMY STORE won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.