Competitor profile

Vinytics Peripherals Pvt. Ltd.,

They won all 2 of their bids with a result, worth ₹4.0 L.

2tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
9 Dec 2016last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.0 L
of ₹4.0 L bid — 100.0% conversion
Win rate
100.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count2 bids
100.0%
Awarded2100.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹4.0 L
100.0%
Awarded₹4.0 L100.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Delhi₹4.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Mercury lab Planners0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Rama Electric and Machinery Stores1 win · 1 shared tender
₹3.4 L
won head-to-head
03
VPL INFOTECH AND CONSULTANTS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
chandeep singh0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Agmatel India Pvt.Ltd0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedVinytics Peripherals awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Vinytics Peripherals

About Vinytics Peripherals Pvt. Ltd.,

Vinytics Peripherals Pvt. Ltd., appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 100.0% win rate — worth ₹4.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 9 Dec 2016.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is I.T.I. Pusa New Delhi, at 86.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Delhi.

It most often bids against Mercury lab Planners, Rama Electric and Machinery Stores and VPL INFOTECH AND CONSULTANTS. Mercury lab Planners bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; Vinytics Peripherals Pvt. Ltd., won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.