Competitor profile

M/s Vinod Mutha

They win 59% of what they bid, but only 46% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

48tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
17 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
46
48 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
27
15 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹27.3 Cr
of ₹59.2 Cr bid — 46.1% conversion
Win rate
58.7%
of 46 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count46 bids
58.7%
32.6%
Awarded2758.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected48.7%
Lost1532.6%
By value₹59.2 Cr
46.1%
16.2%
37.6%
Awarded₹27.3 Cr46.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹9.6 Cr16.2%
Lost₹22.3 Cr37.6%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RDD-CEO-PUNE₹17.4 Cr63.9%
RDD-CEO-SATARA₹9.9 Cr36.1%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹27.3 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Shubham Ashok Khatode8 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹12.0 Cr
won head-to-head
03
AKASH CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
VISHAL BABURAO DHOTRE0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SAILEELA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
DEOKAR ENTERPRISES0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedVinod Mutha awardedOthers

About M/s Vinod Mutha

M/s Vinod Mutha appears as a bidder on 48 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 46 decided bids, it was awarded 27 — a 58.7% win rate — worth ₹27.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is RDD-CEO-PUNE, at 63.9% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against ARYAN AGRO BUSINESS AND INFRA PROJECTS LLP, Shubham Ashok Khatode and AKASH CONSTRUCTION. ARYAN AGRO BUSINESS AND INFRA PROJECTS LLP bid on 15 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/s Vinod Mutha won 13.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.