Competitor profile

VINOD LUTHRA AND ASSOCIATES

They win 14% of what they bid, but only 2% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

23tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
17 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
22
23 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
10 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.2 Cr
of ₹102.0 Cr bid — 2.1% conversion
Win rate
13.6%
of 22 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count22 bids
13.6%
40.9%
45.5%
Awarded313.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected940.9%
Lost1045.5%
By value₹102.0 Cr
48.8%
49.1%
Awarded₹2.2 Cr2.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹49.8 Cr48.8%
Lost₹50.1 Cr49.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹2.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S.S.R.THOMBRE0 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
B T Kadlag Construction Pvt. Ltd.0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SUYOG INFRASTRUCTURE2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹3.6 Cr
won head-to-head
04
gajanan construction0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
KAILASH KISAN BINNAR0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
RUTVIK RAMAKANT DONGARE0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedVINOD LUTHRA awardedOthers

About VINOD LUTHRA AND ASSOCIATES

VINOD LUTHRA AND ASSOCIATES appears as a bidder on 23 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 22 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 13.6% win rate — worth ₹2.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Nashik Municipal Corporation, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 7.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S.S.R.THOMBRE, B T Kadlag Construction Pvt. Ltd. and SUYOG INFRASTRUCTURE. M/S.S.R.THOMBRE bid on 11 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; VINOD LUTHRA AND ASSOCIATES won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.