Competitor profile

VINOD AMRUTA CHAVAN

They win 29% of what they bid, and 34% of the value they chase.

7tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
12 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹50.4 L
of ₹1.5 Cr bid — 33.5% conversion
Win rate
28.6%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count7 bids
28.6%
28.6%
42.9%
Awarded228.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected228.6%
Lost342.9%
By value₹1.5 Cr
33.5%
18.0%
48.5%
Awarded₹50.4 L33.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹27.1 L18.0%
Lost₹72.9 L48.5%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RDD-CEO-SOLAPUR₹29.5 L58.6%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹50.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Vinayak Babu Tele0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
RAHUL DILIP SALABATTE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
KHURD RAJKUMAR BHIMRAO0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
KAILAS KALAPPA LANDE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SAVAN NAMDEV CHAVAN0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
BHOSALE NARENDRA NAGANATH0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedVINOD AMRUTA awardedOthers

About VINOD AMRUTA CHAVAN

VINOD AMRUTA CHAVAN appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 28.6% win rate — worth ₹50.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 12 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is RDD-CEO-SOLAPUR, at 58.6% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 16.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Vinayak Babu Tele, RAHUL DILIP SALABATTE and KHURD RAJKUMAR BHIMRAO. Vinayak Babu Tele bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; VINOD AMRUTA CHAVAN won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.