Competitor profile

M/s Vimla Construction

They win 80% of what they bid, and 86% of the value they chase.

10tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
16 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
10
10 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
8
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.0 Cr
of ₹2.3 Cr bid — 85.9% conversion
Win rate
80.0%
of 10 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count10 bids
80.0%
20.0%
Awarded880.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost220.0%
By value₹2.3 Cr
85.9%
14.1%
Awarded₹2.0 Cr85.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹33.0 L14.1%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹2.0 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Shiv Kumar Maurya0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Shakuntala Construction1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹6.5 L
won head-to-head
03
Pawan Brother Construction0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S SHREE BALA JI ENTERPRISES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
₹0
won head-to-head
06
C B CONSTRUCTIONS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedVimla Construction awardedOthers

About M/s Vimla Construction

M/s Vimla Construction appears as a bidder on 10 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 10 decided bids, it was awarded 8 — a 80.0% win rate — worth ₹2.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 16 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate of Local Bodies UP, at 88.3% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Shiv Kumar Maurya, Shakuntala Construction and Pawan Brother Construction. Shiv Kumar Maurya bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/s Vimla Construction won 6.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.