Competitor profile

Vimalaenterprises

They win 7% of what they bid, and 2% of the value they chase.

29tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
5 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
29
29 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
7 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.7 L
of ₹2.8 Cr bid — 2.0% conversion
Win rate
6.9%
of 29 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count29 bids
69.0%
24.1%
Awarded26.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected2069.0%
Lost724.1%
By value₹2.8 Cr
70.1%
27.9%
Awarded₹5.7 L2.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.0 Cr70.1%
Lost₹79.4 L27.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹5.7 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MS INFRAPROJECTS6 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹45.9 L
won head-to-head
02
THAKUR CONSTRUCTION1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹9.9 L
won head-to-head
03
ParamDevelopers1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹6.8 L
won head-to-head
04
ORIO INFRA0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
S K INFRAPROJECTS1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹12.4 L
won head-to-head
06
C R Construction1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹5.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedVimalaenterprises awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Vimalaenterprises

About Vimalaenterprises

Vimalaenterprises appears as a bidder on 29 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 29 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 6.9% win rate — worth ₹5.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against MS INFRAPROJECTS, THAKUR CONSTRUCTION and ParamDevelopers. MS INFRAPROJECTS bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; Vimalaenterprises won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.