Competitor profile

Vilas R. Bamnote

They win 17% of what they bid, and 9% of the value they chase.

30tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
25 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
29
30 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
22 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹52.4 L
of ₹5.8 Cr bid — 9.0% conversion
Win rate
17.2%
of 29 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count29 bids
17.2%
75.9%
Awarded517.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected26.9%
Lost2275.9%
By value₹5.8 Cr
10.6%
80.4%
Awarded₹52.4 L9.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹61.6 L10.6%
Lost₹4.7 Cr80.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RDD-CEO-AMRAVATI₹52.4 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹52.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
PRAJOT KAWATKAR3 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹19.3 L
won head-to-head
02
HARSHAL TAORI2 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹21.9 L
won head-to-head
03
Umesh Naik0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Vikil Narendra Wankhade0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Dhiraj Deshmukh0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Pankaj Ramakant Tayade3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedVilas R. Bamnote awardedOthers

About Vilas R. Bamnote

Vilas R. Bamnote appears as a bidder on 30 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 29 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 17.2% win rate — worth ₹52.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 25 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is RDD-CEO-AMRAVATI, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against PRAJOT KAWATKAR, HARSHAL TAORI and Umesh Naik. PRAJOT KAWATKAR bid on 15 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; Vilas R. Bamnote won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.