Competitor profile

VIKAS KASHYAP

They win 16% of what they bid, and 12% of the value they chase.

44tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
25 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
43
44 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
32 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹39.2 L
of ₹3.4 Cr bid — 11.7% conversion
Win rate
16.3%
of 43 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count43 bids
16.3%
74.4%
Awarded716.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected49.3%
Lost3274.4%
By value₹3.4 Cr
11.7%
79.4%
Awarded₹39.2 L11.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹30.0 L8.9%
Lost₹2.7 Cr79.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Kuldeep Sharma6 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹54.3 L
won head-to-head
02
AJAY SHARMA1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹14.5 L
won head-to-head
03
SATISH KUMAR JAGTA3 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹23.4 L
won head-to-head
04
DHEERAJ PARMAR1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹6.1 L
won head-to-head
05
devinder singh1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹2.3 L
won head-to-head
06
Govind Singh2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹5.8 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedVIKAS KASHYAP awardedOthers

About VIKAS KASHYAP

VIKAS KASHYAP appears as a bidder on 44 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 43 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 16.3% win rate — worth ₹39.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 25 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Municipal Corporation Shimla, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Himachal Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 9.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Kuldeep Sharma, AJAY SHARMA and SATISH KUMAR JAGTA. Kuldeep Sharma bid on 11 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; VIKAS KASHYAP won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.