Competitor profile

VARGOV TRAFFIC DEVICE SYSTEMS

They win 19% of what they bid, and 18% of the value they chase.

21tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
5 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
21
21 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
11 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹11.6 Cr
of ₹64.3 Cr bid — 18.1% conversion
Win rate
19.1%
of 21 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count21 bids
19.0%
28.6%
52.4%
Awarded419.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected628.6%
Lost1152.4%
By value₹64.3 Cr
18.1%
10.8%
71.1%
Awarded₹11.6 Cr18.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹6.9 Cr10.8%
Lost₹45.7 Cr71.1%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Assam₹11.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MD SOIDUR RAHMAN0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M/S ANKUR ENTERPRISE0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/s R.D.Constructions0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S B. L. AGARWALA0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SHYAM SUNDER GATTANI0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S GANGOTRI ENTERPRISE2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹5.5 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedVARGOV TRAFFIC awardedOthers

About VARGOV TRAFFIC DEVICE SYSTEMS

VARGOV TRAFFIC DEVICE SYSTEMS appears as a bidder on 21 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 21 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 19.1% win rate — worth ₹11.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Roads Department, at 84.8% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Assam. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against MD SOIDUR RAHMAN, M/S ANKUR ENTERPRISE and M/s R.D.Constructions. MD SOIDUR RAHMAN bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; VARGOV TRAFFIC DEVICE SYSTEMS won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.