Competitor profile

VAIBHAV MORE

They win 14% of what they bid — and 39% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

7tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
25 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹71.1 L
of ₹1.8 Cr bid — 39.1% conversion
Win rate
14.3%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count7 bids
14.3%
14.3%
71.4%
Awarded114.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected114.3%
Lost571.4%
By value₹1.8 Cr
39.1%
10.2%
50.7%
Awarded₹71.1 L39.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹18.5 L10.2%
Lost₹92.2 L50.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Public Works Region₹71.1 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹71.1 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Sumit Madhavrao Metkar2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹46.0 L
won head-to-head
02
MOHAMMAD NEHAL NADEEM ABDUL SHAFIQUE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Akshay Kishor Mankar0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
₹0
won head-to-head
05
R P MUNDHADA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Prasad Dod0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedVAIBHAV MORE awardedOthers

About VAIBHAV MORE

VAIBHAV MORE appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 14.3% win rate — worth ₹71.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 25 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Region, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Sumit Madhavrao Metkar, MOHAMMAD NEHAL NADEEM ABDUL SHAFIQUE and Akshay Kishor Mankar. Sumit Madhavrao Metkar bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; VAIBHAV MORE won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.