Competitor profile

VAIBHAV BALAJI LALME

They win 20% of what they bid, and 24% of the value they chase.

6tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
18 May 2026last award
Total bids
5
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹57.1 L
of ₹2.4 Cr bid — 23.6% conversion
Win rate
20.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count5 bids
20.0%
60.0%
20.0%
Awarded120.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected360.0%
Lost120.0%
By value₹2.4 Cr
23.6%
43.2%
33.2%
Awarded₹57.1 L23.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.0 Cr43.2%
Lost₹80.5 L33.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹57.1 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ADITI CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SHRI GAJANAN CONSTRUCTION NANDED2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹89.3 L
won head-to-head
03
SHRI YASHWANT DIGAMBAR PAWAR U E E0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SUPRIYA ENTERPRISES1 win · 1 shared tender
₹78.5 L
won head-to-head
05
VENKANNA NARSINGRAO MADPELLIWAR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
ENGG DATTA SAHEBRAO UDBUKE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedVAIBHAV BALAJI awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to VAIBHAV BALAJI

About VAIBHAV BALAJI LALME

VAIBHAV BALAJI LALME appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 20.0% win rate — worth ₹57.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE and CA CADA Aurangabad, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ADITI CONSTRUCTION, SHRI GAJANAN CONSTRUCTION NANDED and SHRI YASHWANT DIGAMBAR PAWAR U E E. ADITI CONSTRUCTION bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; VAIBHAV BALAJI LALME won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.