Competitor profile

V.M.Enterprises

They win 44% of what they bid, but only 20% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

9tenders on record
6buyer authorities
0states
4 Aug 2025last award
Total bids
9
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹99.7 L
of ₹4.9 Cr bid — 20.2% conversion
Win rate
44.4%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count9 bids
44.4%
22.2%
33.3%
Awarded444.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected222.2%
Lost333.3%
By value₹4.9 Cr
20.2%
63.8%
16.0%
Awarded₹99.7 L20.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.2 Cr63.8%
Lost₹79.2 L16.0%

Where they win

3 authorities · 0 states

Operating states

LowHigh

4 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
NILKAMAL LIMITED3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹3.2 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Jalaram Steel Furniture Pvt. Ltd.0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Metafab Technologies0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
PRECISION LAB FURNITURE INDUSTRIES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
OM Woods0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
I-MATRIX IT SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedV.M.Enterprises awardedOthers

About V.M.Enterprises

V.M.Enterprises appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 6 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 44.4% win rate — worth ₹99.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 4 Aug 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research, at 69.7% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against NILKAMAL LIMITED, Jalaram Steel Furniture Pvt. Ltd. and Metafab Technologies. NILKAMAL LIMITED bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; V.M.Enterprises won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.