Competitor profile

Metafab Technologies

They win 14% of what they bid, and 11% of the value they chase.

7tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
18 Mar 2025last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.0 L
of ₹36.2 L bid — 10.9% conversion
Win rate
14.3%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count7 bids
14.3%
71.4%
14.3%
Awarded114.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected571.4%
Lost114.3%
By value₹36.2 L
10.9%
84.3%
Awarded₹4.0 L10.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹30.5 L84.3%
Lost₹1.7 L4.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
NILKAMAL LIMITED4 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹23.4 L
won head-to-head
02
OM Woods0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
I-MATRIX IT SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
V.M.Enterprises0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
KEERTHI MARKETING0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SRI SHAKTHI LAB SOLUTIONS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMetafab Technologies awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Metafab Technologies

About Metafab Technologies

Metafab Technologies appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 14.3% win rate — worth ₹4.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 Mar 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is National Institute of Technology Calicut, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 20.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against NILKAMAL LIMITED, OM Woods and I-MATRIX IT SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED. NILKAMAL LIMITED bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; Metafab Technologies won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.