Competitor profile

UTTAM KUMAR ROY

They win 36% of what they bid, and 39% of the value they chase.

224tenders on record
7buyer authorities
1state
24 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
224
224 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
81
134 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹7.5 Cr
of ₹19.4 Cr bid — 38.5% conversion
Win rate
36.2%
of 224 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count224 bids
36.2%
59.8%
Awarded8136.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected94.0%
Lost13459.8%
By value₹19.4 Cr
38.5%
55.0%
Awarded₹7.5 Cr38.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.3 Cr6.5%
Lost₹10.7 Cr55.0%

Where they win

4 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Tripura₹7.5 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
KAJAL BANIK4 wins · 20 shared tenders
₹16.4 L
won head-to-head
02
SUBHABRATA CHAKRABORTY6 wins · 17 shared tenders
₹75.6 L
won head-to-head
03
PRASANTA DEBNATH8 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹27.5 L
won head-to-head
04
KAJAL BHOWMIK3 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹25.9 L
won head-to-head
05
ABHIJIT DEB4 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹10.0 L
won head-to-head
06
AMIT SAHA4 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹42.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedUTTAM KUMAR awardedOthers

About UTTAM KUMAR ROY

UTTAM KUMAR ROY appears as a bidder on 224 government tenders on record, from 7 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 224 decided bids, it was awarded 81 — a 36.2% win rate — worth ₹7.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Mayor- Agartala Municipal Corporation, at 70.7% of what it has won, out of 4 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Tripura. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against KAJAL BANIK, SUBHABRATA CHAKRABORTY and PRASANTA DEBNATH. KAJAL BANIK bid on 20 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; UTTAM KUMAR ROY won 7.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.