Competitor profile

Uttam Bhausaheb Nawale

They win 7% of what they bid, and 10% of the value they chase.

15tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
20 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
14
15 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
9 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.0 Cr
of ₹28.6 Cr bid — 10.4% conversion
Win rate
7.1%
of 14 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count14 bids
28.6%
64.3%
Awarded17.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected428.6%
Lost964.3%
By value₹28.6 Cr
10.4%
35.1%
54.5%
Awarded₹3.0 Cr10.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹10.0 Cr35.1%
Lost₹15.6 Cr54.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹3.0 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RAJMUDRA INFRASTRUCTURE1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹2.4 Cr
won head-to-head
02
subodh Infrastructure5 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹3.7 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M/s B M Infrastructures1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹3.1 Cr
won head-to-head
04
K. K. PATEL0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
VISHAL CONSTRUWELL0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Bhagyashree Construction0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedUttam Bhausaheb awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Uttam Bhausaheb

About Uttam Bhausaheb Nawale

Uttam Bhausaheb Nawale appears as a bidder on 15 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 14 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 7.1% win rate — worth ₹3.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 20 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE (WRD) North Maharashtra Region Nashik, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against RAJMUDRA INFRASTRUCTURE, subodh Infrastructure and M/s B M Infrastructures. RAJMUDRA INFRASTRUCTURE bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Uttam Bhausaheb Nawale won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.