Competitor profile

Unique Facility Management Services

They win 20% of what they bid, and 23% of the value they chase.

5tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
28 Jan 2025last award
Total bids
5
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹100
of ₹433 bid — 23.1% conversion
Win rate
20.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count5 bids
20.0%
80.0%
Awarded120.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost480.0%
By value₹433
23.1%
76.9%
Awarded₹10023.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹33376.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Konarak Global Services2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹109
won head-to-head
02
M/s AJAY KUMAR SAINI0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
ms satish chandra gaur0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S DEEPAK KALA1 win · 1 shared tender
₹69
won head-to-head
05
M/S KRIPAL SINGH CONTRACTOR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedUnique Facility awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Unique Facility

About Unique Facility Management Services

Unique Facility Management Services appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 20.0% win rate — worth ₹100 in total. Its most recent award on record is from 28 Jan 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CMS Govt. Combined Hospital Roorkee, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 18.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Konarak Global Services, M/s AJAY KUMAR SAINI and ms satish chandra gaur. Konarak Global Services bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; Unique Facility Management Services won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.