Competitor profile

UM-Techno Services

They win 13% of what they bid, and 15% of the value they chase.

18tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
17 May 2024last award
Total bids
16
18 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
10 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.4 Cr
of ₹22.5 Cr bid — 14.9% conversion
Win rate
12.5%
of 16 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count16 bids
12.5%
25.0%
62.5%
Awarded212.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected425.0%
Lost1062.5%
By value₹22.5 Cr
14.9%
26.5%
58.5%
Awarded₹3.4 Cr14.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹6.0 Cr26.5%
Lost₹13.2 Cr58.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Assam₹3.4 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
NABA BASUMATARY1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹88.7 L
won head-to-head
02
KEMENDRA KUMAR BRAHMA0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
MWIKHWM OWARY0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
DAHAR BASUMATARY4 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹3.2 Cr
won head-to-head
05
Sri Subha Basumatary1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹91.8 L
won head-to-head
06
SOGANI COMMERCIAL0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedUM-Techno Services awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to UM-Techno Services

About UM-Techno Services

UM-Techno Services appears as a bidder on 18 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 16 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 12.5% win rate — worth ₹3.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 May 2024.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Bodoland Territorial Council-PWD, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Assam. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against NABA BASUMATARY, KEMENDRA KUMAR BRAHMA and MWIKHWM OWARY. NABA BASUMATARY bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; UM-Techno Services won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.