Competitor profile

M/s U And M Enterprises

They win 33% of what they bid, and 40% of the value they chase.

4tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
29 Aug 2025last award
Total bids
3
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹57.4 L
of ₹1.4 Cr bid — 39.7% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count3 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost266.7%
By value₹1.4 Cr
39.7%
60.3%
Awarded₹57.4 L39.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹87.3 L60.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SUMIT SHARMA1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹45.1 L
won head-to-head
02
JAG ANAND CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S VIKASH ENTERPRISES0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S SONAM ENTERPRISES1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹34.9 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S JAI MAA TRADERS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SUMAN KUMAR SINGH0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedU And M awardedOthers

About M/s U And M Enterprises

M/s U And M Enterprises appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹57.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Aug 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Eastern Coalfields Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 8.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SUMIT SHARMA, JAG ANAND CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED and M/S VIKASH ENTERPRISES. SUMIT SHARMA bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/s U And M Enterprises won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.