Competitor profile

VIKASH ENTERPRISES

They win 23% of what they bid, and 25% of the value they chase.

44tenders on record
4buyer authorities
0states
1 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
43
44 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
10
18 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.7 Cr
of ₹18.7 Cr bid — 25.3% conversion
Win rate
23.3%
of 43 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count43 bids
23.3%
34.9%
41.9%
Awarded1023.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1534.9%
Lost1841.9%
By value₹18.7 Cr
25.3%
29.9%
44.8%
Awarded₹4.7 Cr25.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹5.6 Cr29.9%
Lost₹8.4 Cr44.8%

Where they win

3 authorities · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

10 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S Amit Sharma2 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹29.9 L
won head-to-head
02
SUMIT SHARMA2 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹84.2 L
won head-to-head
03
M/s. BIJYENDRA KUMAR SINGH0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S I.P. ASSOCIATES1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
05
M/S G.R BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹1.5 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S SONAM ENTERPRISES1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹34.9 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedVIKASH ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About VIKASH ENTERPRISES

VIKASH ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 44 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 43 decided bids, it was awarded 10 — a 23.3% win rate — worth ₹4.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Northern Coalfields Limited, at 81.2% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S Amit Sharma, SUMIT SHARMA and M/s. BIJYENDRA KUMAR SINGH. M/S Amit Sharma bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; VIKASH ENTERPRISES won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.