Competitor profile

M/S TIRUPATI TRADERS

They win 56% of what they bid, and 51% of the value they chase.

28tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
16 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
27
28 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
15
12 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.5 Cr
of ₹8.8 Cr bid — 51.0% conversion
Win rate
55.6%
of 27 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count27 bids
55.6%
44.4%
Awarded1555.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1244.4%
By value₹8.8 Cr
51.0%
49.0%
Awarded₹4.5 Cr51.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹4.3 Cr49.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹4.5 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Spiez Innovation1 win · 14 shared tenders
₹43.1 L
won head-to-head
02
Balaji Constructions0 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S I.J.TILES INDUSTRIES0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
shree tirupati enterprises8 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹76.3 L
won head-to-head
05
M/s Anand Construction2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹2.9 Cr
won head-to-head
06
RAJVEER ENTERPRISES0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedTIRUPATI TRADERS awardedOthers

About M/S TIRUPATI TRADERS

M/S TIRUPATI TRADERS appears as a bidder on 28 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 27 decided bids, it was awarded 15 — a 55.6% win rate — worth ₹4.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 16 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Director Cum Chief Engineer RED, at 89.1% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Spiez Innovation, Balaji Constructions and M/S I.J.TILES INDUSTRIES. Spiez Innovation bid on 14 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/S TIRUPATI TRADERS won 12.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.