Competitor profile

TIRUPATI CONSTRUCTIONS

They win 30% of what they bid, and 37% of the value they chase.

10tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
3 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
10
10 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.5 Cr
of ₹4.2 Cr bid — 36.8% conversion
Win rate
30.0%
of 10 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count10 bids
30.0%
10.0%
60.0%
Awarded330.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected110.0%
Lost660.0%
By value₹4.2 Cr
36.8%
53.8%
Awarded₹1.5 Cr36.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹39.8 L9.5%
Lost₹2.3 Cr53.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Public Works Region₹1.5 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹1.5 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SACHIN BAJIRAO MULAK1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹39.8 L
won head-to-head
02
R.V. NIGHVEKAR2 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹89.7 L
won head-to-head
03
PRADNYA CONSTRUCTION1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹31.5 L
won head-to-head
04
SHINDE-PATIL CONSTRUCTION OMERGA1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹52.1 L
won head-to-head
05
VIRAJ RAJANIKANT KAMBLE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Alim Abdual Vijapure0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedTIRUPATI CONSTRUCTIONS awardedOthers

About TIRUPATI CONSTRUCTIONS

TIRUPATI CONSTRUCTIONS appears as a bidder on 10 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 10 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 30.0% win rate — worth ₹1.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Region, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SACHIN BAJIRAO MULAK, R.V. NIGHVEKAR and PRADNYA CONSTRUCTION. SACHIN BAJIRAO MULAK bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; TIRUPATI CONSTRUCTIONS won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.