Competitor profile

TIRUPATI CONSTRUCTION

They win 25% of what they bid, and 23% of the value they chase.

40tenders on record
11buyer authorities
1state
25 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
40
40 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
10
23 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.6 Cr
of ₹24.0 Cr bid — 23.5% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 40 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count40 bids
25.0%
17.5%
57.5%
Awarded1025.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected717.5%
Lost2357.5%
By value₹24.0 Cr
23.5%
31.0%
45.6%
Awarded₹5.6 Cr23.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹7.4 Cr31.0%
Lost₹10.9 Cr45.6%

Where they win

5 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Public Works Region₹3.0 Cr53.0%
RDD-CEO-NANDED₹19.8 L3.5%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹5.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
R.V. NIGHVEKAR0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SACHIN BAJIRAO MULAK1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹9.4 L
won head-to-head
03
Amar Rohidas Devade0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
PRATHMESH DESALE3 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹17.4 L
won head-to-head
05
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Shree Ketan Bhanudas Jagtap0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedTIRUPATI CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About TIRUPATI CONSTRUCTION

TIRUPATI CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 40 government tenders on record, from 11 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 40 decided bids, it was awarded 10 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹5.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 25 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Region, at 53.0% of what it has won, out of 5 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against R.V. NIGHVEKAR, SACHIN BAJIRAO MULAK and Amar Rohidas Devade. R.V. NIGHVEKAR bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; TIRUPATI CONSTRUCTION won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.