Competitor profile

M/S TILKU ENTERPRISE

They win 7% of what they bid, and 6% of the value they chase.

28tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
27 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
28
28 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
26 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹69.9 L
of ₹12.6 Cr bid — 5.5% conversion
Win rate
7.1%
of 28 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count28 bids
92.9%
Awarded27.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost2692.9%
By value₹12.6 Cr
94.5%
Awarded₹69.9 L5.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹11.9 Cr94.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

2 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S DYNAMIC INDIA (PROJECT) CONSTRUCTION2 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹91.9 L
won head-to-head
02
S.P.S. SUPPLIERS1 win · 13 shared tenders
₹45.1 L
won head-to-head
03
KAZI SAHABUL ALAM1 win · 11 shared tenders
₹33.3 L
won head-to-head
04
SANJAY KUMAR SUPAN0 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S BHATTACHARJEE ENTERPRISE1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹33.5 L
won head-to-head
06
M/s S A TRADING0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedTILKU ENTERPRISE awardedOthers

About M/S TILKU ENTERPRISE

M/S TILKU ENTERPRISE appears as a bidder on 28 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 28 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 7.1% win rate — worth ₹69.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 27 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 7.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S DYNAMIC INDIA (PROJECT) CONSTRUCTION, S.P.S. SUPPLIERS and KAZI SAHABUL ALAM. M/S DYNAMIC INDIA (PROJECT) CONSTRUCTION bid on 16 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; M/S TILKU ENTERPRISE won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.