Competitor profile

KAZI SAHABUL ALAM

They win 7% of what they bid, and 5% of the value they chase.

61tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
11 May 2026last award
Total bids
59
61 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
53 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.2 Cr
of ₹24.2 Cr bid — 5.1% conversion
Win rate
6.8%
of 59 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count59 bids
89.8%
Awarded46.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected23.4%
Lost5389.8%
By value₹24.2 Cr
91.7%
Awarded₹1.2 Cr5.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹76.5 L3.2%
Lost₹22.2 Cr91.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

4 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
S.P.S. SUPPLIERS1 win · 24 shared tenders
₹45.1 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S DYNAMIC INDIA (PROJECT) CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 23 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
BHARAT CONSTRUCTION8 wins · 20 shared tenders
₹3.4 Cr
won head-to-head
04
SANJAY KUMAR SUPAN2 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹87.1 L
won head-to-head
05
NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION CO1 win · 13 shared tenders
₹39.7 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S TILKU ENTERPRISE1 win · 11 shared tenders
₹37.4 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKAZI SAHABUL awardedOthers

About KAZI SAHABUL ALAM

KAZI SAHABUL ALAM appears as a bidder on 61 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 59 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 6.8% win rate — worth ₹1.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 11 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against S.P.S. SUPPLIERS, M/S DYNAMIC INDIA (PROJECT) CONSTRUCTION and BHARAT CONSTRUCTION. S.P.S. SUPPLIERS bid on 24 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; KAZI SAHABUL ALAM won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.