Competitor profile

Tilak Ch. Nath

They win 10% of what they bid, and 16% of the value they chase.

10tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
18 Mar 2026last award
Total bids
10
10 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹65.8 L
of ₹4.0 Cr bid — 16.5% conversion
Win rate
10.0%
of 10 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count10 bids
10.0%
70.0%
20.0%
Awarded110.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected770.0%
Lost220.0%
By value₹4.0 Cr
16.5%
54.4%
29.2%
Awarded₹65.8 L16.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.2 Cr54.4%
Lost₹1.2 Cr29.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Assam₹65.8 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Sri Dilip Kumar Deka2 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/S M. K. Enterprise2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹49.7 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S GLASS N GLAZING1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹25.9 L
won head-to-head
04
KHAIRUL HOQUE CHOUDHURY0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SUKUMAR ENTERPRISE1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹23.5 L
won head-to-head
06
KULAJIT GOSWAMI1 win · 1 shared tender
₹25.9 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedTilak Ch. Nath awardedOthers

About Tilak Ch. Nath

Tilak Ch. Nath appears as a bidder on 10 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 10 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 10.0% win rate — worth ₹65.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 Mar 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Roads Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Assam. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Sri Dilip Kumar Deka, M/S M. K. Enterprise and M/S GLASS N GLAZING. Sri Dilip Kumar Deka bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; Tilak Ch. Nath won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.