Competitor profile

TIKA RAM CHAMOLI

They win 22% of what they bid, and 16% of the value they chase.

18tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
18 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
18
18 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.2 Cr
of ₹7.8 Cr bid — 15.8% conversion
Win rate
22.2%
of 18 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count18 bids
22.2%
55.6%
22.2%
Awarded422.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1055.6%
Lost422.2%
By value₹7.8 Cr
15.8%
58.5%
25.7%
Awarded₹1.2 Cr15.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹4.5 Cr58.5%
Lost₹2.0 Cr25.7%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RES - Chief Engineer₹95.7 L78.2%
CE-HOD₹26.7 L21.8%

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹1.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Sarat Singh Negi0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
GIRJA PRASAD SEMWAL1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹25.3 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S Harish Chand Ramola1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹25.1 L
won head-to-head
04
Rajendra Singh Negi0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Sumer Bhatt0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
mahesh singh1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹39.5 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedTIKA RAM CHAMOLI awardedOthers

About TIKA RAM CHAMOLI

TIKA RAM CHAMOLI appears as a bidder on 18 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 18 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 22.2% win rate — worth ₹1.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is RES - Chief Engineer, at 78.2% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Sarat Singh Negi, GIRJA PRASAD SEMWAL and M/S Harish Chand Ramola. Sarat Singh Negi bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; TIKA RAM CHAMOLI won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.