Competitor profile

Sumer Bhatt

They win 30% of what they bid, and 39% of the value they chase.

37tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
15 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
37
37 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
11
10 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹10.5 Cr
of ₹26.9 Cr bid — 39.0% conversion
Win rate
29.7%
of 37 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count37 bids
29.7%
43.2%
27.0%
Awarded1129.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1643.2%
Lost1027.0%
By value₹26.9 Cr
39.0%
29.3%
31.7%
Awarded₹10.5 Cr39.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹7.9 Cr29.3%
Lost₹8.5 Cr31.7%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹10.5 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
GIRJA PRASAD SEMWAL1 win · 9 shared tenders
₹25.3 L
won head-to-head
02
M/s Man singh Rautela3 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹2.4 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M.H CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
RIJWAN ALI3 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹2.9 Cr
won head-to-head
05
Virendra Singh Rawat0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Raven Singh Bisht1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹53.3 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSumer Bhatt awardedOthers

About Sumer Bhatt

Sumer Bhatt appears as a bidder on 37 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 37 decided bids, it was awarded 11 — a 29.7% win rate — worth ₹10.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 15 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MD (Drinking Water) Peyjal Nigam GoUK, at 83.7% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against GIRJA PRASAD SEMWAL, M/s Man singh Rautela and M.H CONSTRUCTION. GIRJA PRASAD SEMWAL bid on 9 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Sumer Bhatt won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.