Competitor profile

TARLOCHAN SINGH AND CO

They win 39% of what they bid, and 34% of the value they chase.

28tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
26 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
28
28 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
11
17 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.0 Cr
of ₹14.8 Cr bid — 33.9% conversion
Win rate
39.3%
of 28 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count28 bids
39.3%
60.7%
Awarded1139.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1760.7%
By value₹14.8 Cr
33.9%
66.1%
Awarded₹5.0 Cr33.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹9.8 Cr66.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

11 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S MATLOOB AHMED0 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Anil Kumar Gupta3 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹1.7 Cr
won head-to-head
03
SHRI GANESH CONSTRUCTION CO.2 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹78.6 L
won head-to-head
04
HARISH SALES CORPORATION1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹39.4 L
won head-to-head
05
jmv engineers1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹29.6 L
won head-to-head
06
B N FRIENDS AND CO1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹2.2 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedTARLOCHAN SINGH awardedOthers

About TARLOCHAN SINGH AND CO

TARLOCHAN SINGH AND CO appears as a bidder on 28 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 28 decided bids, it was awarded 11 — a 39.3% win rate — worth ₹5.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 26 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S MATLOOB AHMED, Anil Kumar Gupta and SHRI GANESH CONSTRUCTION CO.. M/S MATLOOB AHMED bid on 11 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; TARLOCHAN SINGH AND CO won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.