Competitor profile

M/S MATLOOB AHMED

They win 18% of what they bid, and 14% of the value they chase.

82tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
26 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
79
82 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
14
65 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.3 Cr
of ₹31.5 Cr bid — 13.7% conversion
Win rate
17.7%
of 79 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count79 bids
17.7%
82.3%
Awarded1417.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost6582.3%
By value₹31.5 Cr
13.7%
86.3%
Awarded₹4.3 Cr13.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹27.2 Cr86.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

14 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Baba Engineers and Contractors3 wins · 23 shared tenders
₹1.9 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/s Super Trading Corporation3 wins · 22 shared tenders
₹82.1 L
won head-to-head
03
M/s APEX ENTERPRISES5 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹1.6 Cr
won head-to-head
04
Anil Kumar Gupta2 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
05
JK ENGINEERS2 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹83.5 L
won head-to-head
06
SS BUILDERS1 win · 11 shared tenders
₹49.8 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMATLOOB AHMED awardedOthers

About M/S MATLOOB AHMED

M/S MATLOOB AHMED appears as a bidder on 82 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 79 decided bids, it was awarded 14 — a 17.7% win rate — worth ₹4.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 26 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 8.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Baba Engineers and Contractors, M/s Super Trading Corporation and M/s APEX ENTERPRISES. Baba Engineers and Contractors bid on 23 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; M/S MATLOOB AHMED won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.