Competitor profile

Target Learning Ventures Pvt. Ltd.

They win 50% of what they bid — and 66% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

10tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
24 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
10
10 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6.2 Cr
of ₹9.5 Cr bid — 65.8% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 10 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count10 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded550.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost550.0%
By value₹9.5 Cr
65.8%
34.2%
Awarded₹6.2 Cr65.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹3.2 Cr34.2%

Where they win

4 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹6.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
PRINT PLUS PVT LTD1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹2.0 Cr
won head-to-head
02
PRINT TO PRINT1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹30.4 L
won head-to-head
03
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Lazybone Education Private Limited0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SHINE ENTERPRISE1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹59.3 L
won head-to-head
06
MEDITEK1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹30.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedTarget Learning awardedOthers

About Target Learning Ventures Pvt. Ltd.

Target Learning Ventures Pvt. Ltd. appears as a bidder on 10 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 10 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹6.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Pune Municipal Corporation, at 54.8% of what it has won, out of 4 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against PRINT PLUS PVT LTD, PRINT TO PRINT and Quarterfold Printabilities Private Limited. PRINT PLUS PVT LTD bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Target Learning Ventures Pvt. Ltd. won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.