Competitor profile

T.M.ENTERPRISE

They win 20% of what they bid — and 44% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

41tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
29 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
41
41 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
8
32 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹86.4 L
of ₹1.9 Cr bid — 44.4% conversion
Win rate
19.5%
of 41 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count41 bids
19.5%
78.0%
Awarded819.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected12.4%
Lost3278.0%
By value₹1.9 Cr
44.4%
52.1%
Awarded₹86.4 L44.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹6.8 L3.5%
Lost₹1.0 Cr52.1%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Zilla Parishad₹27.1 L31.3%

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹86.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
A.S.ENTERPRISE18 wins · 22 shared tenders
₹26.7 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S TITAS CONSTRUCTION4 wins · 22 shared tenders
₹5.5 L
won head-to-head
03
ARHAN ENTERPRISE0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
ASHADEEP CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
MAA KALI ENTERPRISE2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹3.3 L
won head-to-head
06
MST ENTERPRISE1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹1.8 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedT.M.ENTERPRISE awardedOthers

About T.M.ENTERPRISE

T.M.ENTERPRISE appears as a bidder on 41 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 41 decided bids, it was awarded 8 — a 19.5% win rate — worth ₹86.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is SUNDARBAN AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, at 68.7% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against A.S.ENTERPRISE, M/S TITAS CONSTRUCTION and ARHAN ENTERPRISE. A.S.ENTERPRISE bid on 22 of the same tenders and won 18 of them; T.M.ENTERPRISE won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.