Competitor profile

M/S T.M. CONSTRUCTION

They win 15% of what they bid — and 83% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

20tenders on record
6buyer authorities
1state
1 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
20
20 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
17 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹11.6 Cr
of ₹14.0 Cr bid — 82.5% conversion
Win rate
15.0%
of 20 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count20 bids
15.0%
85.0%
Awarded315.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1785.0%
By value₹14.0 Cr
82.5%
17.5%
Awarded₹11.6 Cr82.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹2.5 Cr17.5%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD₹11.5 Cr99.4%
Zilla Parishad₹2.2 L0.2%

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹11.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S. RAHAMAN & GANGA CONSTRUCTION4 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹7.9 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S RM CONSTRUCTION2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹1.9 L
won head-to-head
03
MESSRS MANOJ MUKHERJEE AND SONS0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
RAHIDA ENTERPRISES0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S. MUKTA ENTERPRISE1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹1.2 L
won head-to-head
06
M.M. ENTERPRISE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedT.M. CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About M/S T.M. CONSTRUCTION

M/S T.M. CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 20 government tenders on record, from 6 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 20 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 15.0% win rate — worth ₹11.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD, at 99.4% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S. RAHAMAN & GANGA CONSTRUCTION, M/S RM CONSTRUCTION and MESSRS MANOJ MUKHERJEE AND SONS. M/S. RAHAMAN & GANGA CONSTRUCTION bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; M/S T.M. CONSTRUCTION won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.