Competitor profile

SYED AHMED QUTUBUDDIN

They win 39% of what they bid, and 39% of the value they chase.

18tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
29 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
18
18 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
11 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹53.3 L
of ₹1.4 Cr bid — 38.9% conversion
Win rate
38.9%
of 18 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count18 bids
38.9%
61.1%
Awarded738.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1161.1%
By value₹1.4 Cr
38.9%
61.1%
Awarded₹53.3 L38.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹83.6 L61.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹53.3 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S - M. A. CONSTRUCTION11 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹82.0 L
won head-to-head
02
Laxmi Construction Co.0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
KHAN IBRAHIM HAFIZUR RAHMAN0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
PRABHAKAR G MOHITE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
ROHIT RAJENDRA GAIKWAD0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SANDEEP BABANRAO HIWALE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSYED AHMED awardedOthers

About SYED AHMED QUTUBUDDIN

SYED AHMED QUTUBUDDIN appears as a bidder on 18 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 18 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 38.9% win rate — worth ₹53.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Municipal Corporation Aurangabad, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S - M. A. CONSTRUCTION, Laxmi Construction Co. and KHAN IBRAHIM HAFIZUR RAHMAN. M/S - M. A. CONSTRUCTION bid on 16 of the same tenders and won 11 of them; SYED AHMED QUTUBUDDIN won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.