Competitor profile

SWAPNIL LAXMANRAO CHAVAN

They win 50% of what they bid, but only 29% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

4tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
30 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.4 Cr
of ₹5.0 Cr bid — 28.6% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
50.0%
25.0%
25.0%
Awarded250.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected125.0%
Lost125.0%
By value₹5.0 Cr
28.5%
69.6%
Awarded₹1.4 Cr28.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.5 Cr69.6%
Lost₹9.5 L1.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹1.4 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
BHAVNA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
MAPARI INFRAPROJECTS, AURANGABAD0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SPENCER ENTERPRISES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Yash Naresh Patil0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
G. S. R. Construction0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Charniya Construction1 win · 1 shared tender
₹3.5 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSWAPNIL LAXMANRAO awardedOthers

About SWAPNIL LAXMANRAO CHAVAN

SWAPNIL LAXMANRAO CHAVAN appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹1.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Parbhani City Municipal Corporation, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against BHAVNA CONSTRUCTION, MAPARI INFRAPROJECTS, AURANGABAD and SPENCER ENTERPRISES. BHAVNA CONSTRUCTION bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; SWAPNIL LAXMANRAO CHAVAN won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.