Competitor profile

M/s Swami Enterprises

They win 33% of what they bid — and 48% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

3tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
31 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.7 Cr
of ₹3.6 Cr bid — 47.9% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count3 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected266.7%
Lost00.0%
By value₹3.6 Cr
47.9%
52.1%
Awarded₹1.7 Cr47.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.9 Cr52.1%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Directorate of Local Bodies UP₹1.7 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹1.7 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SAGHIR AHMAD0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SIVI K.R. ENTERPRISES1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹93.7 L
won head-to-head
03
VAIBHAV CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
RANJANA PANDEY0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S SHIV KUMAR GUPTA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
RAM ACHAL1 win · 1 shared tender
₹92.8 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSwami Enterprises awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Swami Enterprises

About M/s Swami Enterprises

M/s Swami Enterprises appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹1.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 31 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate of Local Bodies UP, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh.

It most often bids against SAGHIR AHMAD, SIVI K.R. ENTERPRISES and VAIBHAV CONSTRUCTION. SAGHIR AHMAD bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/s Swami Enterprises won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.