Competitor profile

Sutra Marketing and Events LLP

They win 50% of what they bid, but only 28% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

2tenders on record
2buyer authorities
2states
29 May 2026last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹78.5 L
of ₹2.8 Cr bid — 28.4% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected150.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹2.8 Cr
28.4%
71.6%
Awarded₹78.5 L28.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.0 Cr71.6%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Tripura₹78.5 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MART GLOBAL MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LLP0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
₹102
won head-to-head
03
Gayatri Rural Educational Society0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Mazars Advisory LLP0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Aradhya Group0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSutra Marketing awardedOthers

About Sutra Marketing and Events LLP

Sutra Marketing and Events LLP appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 2 states. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹78.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate of Tribal Rehab in Plantation and Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Tripura. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against MART GLOBAL MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LLP, Leadtech Management Consulting Pvt Ltd and Gayatri Rural Educational Society. MART GLOBAL MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LLP bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; Sutra Marketing and Events LLP won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.