Competitor profile

MART GLOBAL MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LLP

They win 44% of what they bid, and 46% of the value they chase.

9tenders on record
7buyer authorities
4states
22 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
9
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.5 Cr
of ₹9.8 Cr bid — 45.6% conversion
Win rate
44.4%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count9 bids
44.4%
11.1%
44.4%
Awarded444.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected111.1%
Lost444.4%
By value₹9.8 Cr
45.6%
48.5%
Awarded₹4.5 Cr45.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹4.8 Cr48.5%
Lost₹57.6 L5.8%

Where they win

4 authorities · 2 states

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
AFC INDIA LIMITED3 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Mazars Advisory LLP1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹14.8 L
won head-to-head
03
Nangia & Co LLP1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
PricewaterhouseCoopers Private Limited3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
₹102
won head-to-head
06
SUTRA CONSULTING PVT. LTD.1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMART GLOBAL awardedOthers

About MART GLOBAL MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LLP

MART GLOBAL MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LLP appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 7 buyer authorities in 4 states. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 44.4% win rate — worth ₹4.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Ministry of Industries and Commerce, at 100.0% of what it has won, out of 4 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Tripura and Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 32.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against AFC INDIA LIMITED, Mazars Advisory LLP and Nangia & Co LLP. AFC INDIA LIMITED bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; MART GLOBAL MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LLP won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.