Competitor profile

SURESHKUMAR

They win 50% of what they bid — and 62% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

12tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
29 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
12
12 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹98.8 L
of ₹1.6 Cr bid — 62.2% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 12 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count12 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded650.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost650.0%
By value₹1.6 Cr
62.2%
37.8%
Awarded₹98.8 L62.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹60.1 L37.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Tamil Nadu₹98.8 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
KALAIMANI VIJAYAGOPAL0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
sriramulu2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹7.5 L
won head-to-head
03
T.SEEMAN1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹2.5 L
won head-to-head
04
Mageshkumar1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹4.4 L
won head-to-head
05
SIVARAMAKRISHNAN0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SUDHA0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSURESHKUMAR awardedOthers

About SURESHKUMAR

SURESHKUMAR appears as a bidder on 12 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 12 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹98.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Tamil Nadu. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against KALAIMANI VIJAYAGOPAL, sriramulu and T.SEEMAN. KALAIMANI VIJAYAGOPAL bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; SURESHKUMAR won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.