Competitor profile

sriramulu

They win 14% of what they bid, and 11% of the value they chase.

22tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
7 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
22
22 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
19 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹11.5 L
of ₹1.1 Cr bid — 10.9% conversion
Win rate
13.6%
of 22 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count22 bids
13.6%
86.4%
Awarded313.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1986.4%
By value₹1.1 Cr
10.9%
89.1%
Awarded₹11.5 L10.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹94.0 L89.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Tamil Nadu₹11.5 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
KALAIMANI VIJAYAGOPAL1 win · 22 shared tenders
₹3.9 L
won head-to-head
02
T.SEEMAN8 wins · 21 shared tenders
₹11.3 L
won head-to-head
03
GP Enterprises1 win · 17 shared tenders
₹2.4 L
won head-to-head
04
Mageshkumar1 win · 13 shared tenders
₹4.4 L
won head-to-head
05
SUDHA0 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Veerajaconstructions0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedsriramulu awardedOthers

About sriramulu

sriramulu appears as a bidder on 22 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 22 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 13.6% win rate — worth ₹11.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 7 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Tamil Nadu. On priced bids, its median quote is 7.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against KALAIMANI VIJAYAGOPAL, T.SEEMAN and GP Enterprises. KALAIMANI VIJAYAGOPAL bid on 22 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; sriramulu won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.