Competitor profile

SURENDRA KUMAR MEENA

They win 33% of what they bid, but only 6% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

3tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
7 Apr 2026last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.9 L
of ₹51.9 L bid — 5.7% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count3 bids
33.3%
33.3%
33.3%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected133.3%
Lost133.3%
By value₹51.9 L
85.9%
Awarded₹2.9 L5.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹4.4 L8.4%
Lost₹44.6 L85.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S RIDHI SIDHI CONSTRUCTIONS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
UNIQUE GARDEN SOLUTIONS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
S R ENTERPRISES1 win · 1 shared tender
₹4.4 L
won head-to-head
04
M/S- NEST INFRA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/s R S Sikarwar0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
sanwaria enterprises0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSURENDRA KUMAR awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to SURENDRA KUMAR

About SURENDRA KUMAR MEENA

SURENDRA KUMAR MEENA appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹2.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 7 Apr 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S RIDHI SIDHI CONSTRUCTIONS, UNIQUE GARDEN SOLUTIONS and S R ENTERPRISES. M/S RIDHI SIDHI CONSTRUCTIONS bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; SURENDRA KUMAR MEENA won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.